Bieber: The Comeback Kid

After being dubbed the youngest artist in history with five No. 1 albums on the Billboard 200 chart, Justin Bieber suffered through a public backlash filled with unflattering tabloid headlines due to his immature and arrogant behavior.

His rebellious antics included everything from spitting on fans, getting caught with drugs, walking off stage, getting caught with a DUI, a smiling mug shot, peeing in public, mocking former President Bill Clinton and more. Over the course of these actions, Bieber went from teenage heartthrob to another teenage celebrity gone wild. But with his own dismissal of his fans, he left himself with very few that still belieb’d in him.

The road to Bieber’s upcoming album Purpose has been an apologetic one, including even a radio single appropriately titled, “Sorry.” It seemed that in every promotional interview he did, he was apologizing for his arrogant behavior.

Including apologies to fans, his family, former President Clinton and more. His apologies were believable, especially when paired with him allowing himself to be the butt of the joke on shows like SNL and the Comedy Central Roast.

No doubt, Bieber couldn’t do this on his own. Admittedly, manager Scooter Braun said that once Justin was ready to take his career back again, they worked together, along with their team, to come up with the perfect strategy.

For my next group project, myself and two other members will be working on analyzing the crisis communication strategies of Justin Bieber as he made a 180 on his public image.

Millennials and the PR Workforce

In a recently published article, “Silent & unprepared: Most millennial practitioners have not embraced role as ethical conscience”, Marlene Neill and Nancy Weaver presented their research findings about millennials in the PR workforce.

Overall, their findings found that there is an overall lack of confidence in offering ethical counsel within their role at work. The research surveyed a over 200 young professionals. There also seemed to be a wide gap in responses from those who have had a mentor verses those who had not and those who had had a course in ethics verses those who had not. Those millennials who had had a mentor who they discussed ethical issues with or those who had had a ethics course felt much more prepared to offer ethical counsel than those without.

Also, according to the research, out of those surveyed, many did not think that they would have to deal with ethical decisions in the future – despite having dealt with them in the past.

As a millennial, I found that the majority of this information made sense with few exceptions. When a young professional is new in their career they may not be willing to rock the boat or go against the status quo of their organization. They’re trying to please their bosses and not ruffle any feathers.

Also, it makes sense that the more training they received in ethics, the more likely they were to be confident in their abilities to provide counsel. I think that’s common with any topic or skill. The more practice you have, the more confident you will be to perform.

The one thing I found perplexing in the research, was the disconnect between millenials’ expectations for the future versus their past expereince dealing with ethical decisions. While most had to deal with ethical decision-making in the past, they did not expect to deal with it in the future.

My only explanation for this is that perhaps they believe that they will be in a position in the future where they are “higher up” and will therefore not be asked to partake in an unethical move. Or perhaps, in the past they perceived these things as unethical, and looking forward they may not see these situations as ethical. Whatever the case, I found it to be interesting for our generation, but perhaps it fits our over-confident and optimistic stereotypical nature.

Source: Neill, M. S., & Weaver, N. Silent & unprepared: Most millennial practitioners have not embraced role as ethical conscience. Public Relations Review (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.01.002